|
|
THE ARCHDIOCESE OF ORTHODOX PARISHES
OF RUSSIAN TRADITION IN WESTERN EUROPE
The Archdiocese is the legal successor and direct continuation of the
“Provisional Administration of Russian Parishes in Western Europe” founded by
Saint Patriarch Tikhon of Moscow and entrusted to Archbishop Evlogy (by decrees
of 8 April 1921, nos 423 & 424) with the agreement of Saint Metropolitan
Benjamin of Petrograd who till then had jurisdiction over the religious
institutions of the Russian Orthodox Church in western Europe (letter dated 21
June 1921).
Metropolitan Evlogy, who
had been forced to leave Russia during the Civil War, had been charged since
1920, by the Supreme Ecclesiastical Administration in the South of Russia, with
the care of the parishes in western Europe, and had been established first in
Berlin, then in Paris (1922). During the summer of 1921 he visited the main
parishes in western Europe, including the parish of the Dormition in London
which was at that time in his jurisdiction. The following year he received a patriarchal
decree from Moscow, dated 5 May 1922, ordering the dissolution of the Supreme
Administration for the Church Abroad, centred in Sremski-Karlovci (Serbia),
because of the political stance taken up by that Administration, and confirming
Metropolitan Evlogy as being in charge of the Russian Orthodox parishes abroad.
However, the Russian bishops in exile in Serbia disregarded the patriarchal
decree, and set themselves up as a “synod abroad” which soon began to trespass
on the canonical rights of Metropolitan Evlogy, especially in Germany. In 1926
there was finally a breach between him and the synod abroad. The conflict
between the bishops caused disturbances in several parishes: some, in Germany
and elsewhere, passed under the jurisdiction of the Synod of Karlovci; others,
including that in London, found themselves split in two. Metropolitan Sergei of
Nizhny-Novgorod, at that time temporarily occupying the patriarchal throne as locum tenens, when consulted said he was
unable to settle the matter because foreign contacts were so difficult: he
simply advised, in accordance with traditional Orthodox ecclesiology, that
Russian emigrés who had settled in parts of the Balkans where there was
a local Orthodox Church should seek full membership of those Churches, and that
those who found themselves outside Orthodox countries should establish a local
Church of their own.
In 1927 Metropolitan
Evlogy had to face a new conflict, this time with the temporary occupant of the
patriarchal throne. To demonstrate his support of Soviet authority, and hoping
to obtain the legalization of the Patriarchate of Moscow, Metropolitan Sergei
of Nizhny-Novgorod accused the clergy of the emigration of being
counter-revolutionary, and demanded an undertaking of loyalty to the USSR. In reply
Metropolitan Evlogy assured him that whilst he himself was completely
apolitical, there could be no question of binding his clergy to the government
of a State of which they were not citizens.
In 1930, when there
occurred a new wave of bloody persecutions against the Church and the faithful
in the Soviet Union, Metropolitan Sergei rebuked Metropolitan Evlogy for taking
part in ecumenical gatherings in London and Paris to pray for the persecuted
Christians of Russia, and at the same time denied in the international press
that any persecution had taken place. Ordered by Moscow to resign, Metropolitan
Evlogy refused to abandon the clergy and faithful who had been entrusted to him
and who had given him their complete confidence. In response Metropolitan Sergei
suspended Metropolitan Evlogy from his duties and put him under an interdict.
The latter appealed to the Ecumenical Patriarch, citing the 9th Canon of the
4th Ecumenical Council which recognized the Throne of Constantinople as a court
of appeal, and put himself under the
protection of that Patriarchate, being anxious to hold together the communities
that had been entrusted to him and to maintain their communion with the fulness
of the Orthodox Church. Patriarch Photius II gave him his support in every
point and took him under his obedience and appointed him Exarch of a
“Provisional Exarchate for the Russian Parishes in Western Europe”. This
position was confirmed by Patriarch Benjamin (in 1937 and 1939) and Patriarch
Maxim (1947). At the end of the Second World War, like many Russian
emigrés of the time, Metropolitan Evlogy felt irresistibly drawn to his
native land where he expected to see a change in the political attitude of the
Stalinist regime in religious matters and a renaissance of the Church. Suffering
from ill health and hoping to be able to return to die in the country of his
birth, he re-established communication with the Patriarch of Moscow, despite
the opposition of many of the clergy and laity who did not trust the promise of
the representatives from Moscow that they would respect the autonomy of the
diocese, and who, for the first time, suggested establishing a local Orthodox
Church. According to them, such an establishment would hard to reconcile with
resuming membership of a national Church like that of Russia. The necessary
agreement of the Patriarch Constantinople was sought, but had still not been
received when Metropolitan Evlogy died in August 1946. His successor,
Metropolitan Vladimir, supported by the Diocesan Assembly, rejected the diktat
from Moscow, choosing instead to preserve the freedom of the diocese. During
the thirteen years that he spent at the head of the Exarchate, Metropolitan
Vladimir continued the work begun by his predecessor, Metropolitan Evlogy, in
faithfulness to the Russian Orthodox tradition, which he himself fully embodied
since he had been ordained before the Revolution, whilst at the same time being
fully aware of the necessity to organize a truly local Church in the countries
where Russian emigrés had been brought by Providence to witness to the
Orthodox faith; and he accepted that this implied the use of western languages
in worship where the need should arise. So it was that the Diocesan Assembly
meeting under his presidency in 1949 sent out a prophetic message in calling
for the unity of all the Orthodox settled in Western Europe, without
distinction of ethnic or national origin, in the setting of a local Church:
“Let us all join together, we and our Orthodox brethren, in one Church in the
countries where God has led us. Let us put all our effort into building a
united Orthodox Church in Western Europe”.
However, yielding to the
pressure of the Patriarchate of Moscow, Patriarch Athenagoras I, in a letter
dated the 22 November 1965, put an end to the administrative status of the
diocese as a “Provisional Exarchate” of the Ecumenical Throne such as it had
been since 1931. The General Extraordinary Assembly of 16—18 February 1966
stated that the hitherto “provisional” nature of its ecclesiastical structures
no longer applied, since they comprised members of the third (and now even the
fourth) generation descended from Russian or other emigrations now permanently
settled in their adoptive countries, with a growing number of Orthodox of
western stock. After a short period of transition for regularizing and bringing
up to date the bonds that had always existed between the Archdiocese and the
Patriarchate of Constantinople, the Archdiocese was fully integrated into the
Patriarchate of Constantinople as a unified ecclesiastical organization with a
special status of internal autonomy (charter of Patriarch Athenagoras I of 22
January 1971).
2. Present canonical and juridical
status
This status was confirmed
and enhanced in June 1999 with the restoration to the Archdiocese of the title
of Exarchate by the Holy Synod of the Ecumenical Patriarchate (Tomos of Patriarch Bartholomew I, 19
June 1999). This status has allowed the Archdiocese to keep its distinct
liturgical and administrative character that has come down from the long and
holy Russian Orthodox tradition, within the obedience of the Patriarchate of
Constantinople. It has assured its freedom in the face of pressures from
outside the Church and it contributes to the witness and the planting of the
Holy Orthodox Faith in the countries of western Europe where the Archdiocese
was settled by Divine Providence (Declarations of the General Assemblies of
October 1949 and February 1966).
From the civil point of
view the Archdiocese is subject within the Republic of France to the
legislation in force governing religious affairs in that country and to the
current statutes laid down by French authority. Thus, the Archdiocese is the
authorized Union for coordinating Russian Orthodox associations, bringing
together all legally established organizations of Orthodox origin, whether
cultural or ecclesiastical.
From the ecclesiastical
point of view, the Archdiocese is subject to the administrative authority and
the spiritual, pastoral and moral direction of a diocesan Archbishop, who is
entitled Exarch of the Ecumenical Patriarch. The present head of the
Archdiocese is Archbishop Gabriel (de Vylder), a Belgian citizen, born on the
13 June 1946 at Lokeren near Ghent in Belgium. After joining the communion of
the Orthodox Church in 1974, he was ordained priest in 1976 in Paris. He served
at Maastrict in the Netherlands and at Liège in Belgium before becoming
Auxiliary Bishop in 2001. Following the death of Archbishop Serge he was
elected on the 1 May 2003 by a large majority of the Diocesan Assembly to be
head of the Archdiocese. His election was confirmed by the Holy Synod of the
Ecumenical Patriarchate on the 3 May which raised him to the rank of Archbishop
and Patriarchal Exarch.
The Archbishop is
assisted in running the Diocese by the Council of the Archdiocese, consisting
of 6 priests and 6 lay people elected by the Diocesan Assembly. The Diocesan
Assembly, which is both clerical and lay, meets every three years. It consists
of all the clergy of the Diocese and of lay delegates elected by the parishes.
One of its chief functions is to elect the Archbishop and the auxiliary
bishops, whose election is then confirmed by a vote of the Holy Synod of the
Ecumenical Patriarchate, as well as by the members of the Diocesan Council. The
headquarters of the Archdiocese and the Archbishop is next to the Cathedral of
St Alexander Nevsky in Paris (12 rue Daru, 75008). At the same address are the
offices of the Diocesan Administration, in the persons of Professor Michel
Sollogoub, who is Secretary of the
Council of the Archdiocese, and M. Ivan Cheret (Tcherepenikov), a retired
company director, who is Treasurer of the Archdiocese.
In its pastoral,
administrative and material life, the Archdiocese is completely autonomous and
independent of the Greek Metropolitans of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in the
countries of Western Europe. The Archdiocese directly elects its Archbishop and
his auxiliary bishops, who are thereafter confirmed by the Holy Synod of
Constantinople. The Archbishop is not subject to any control or bound in any
way, administratively or financially, to the Ecumenical Patriarchate. The
Archbishop takes part in the General Assembly of the Bishops of the Ecumenical
Patriarchate at two or three year intervals at Constantinople. He meets the Patriarch
regularly enough to keep him informed about the life of the Diocese. The
Archbishop also stays directly in touch with the primates and bishops of the
other autocephalous Orthodox churches, without going through Constantinople.
The Archbishop and his auxiliary bishops are full members of the Assembly of
Orthodox Bishops of France, a representative body set up for inter-Orthodox
cooperation, to which all the canonical Orthodox bishops in France belong,
including the bishop appointed by Moscow.
3. The present situation
More than 80 years after its foundation, the Archdiocese has become a
multinational diocese, comprising around 100 parishes and monastic communities, served
by 66 priests and deacons, mainly in France, but also in Belgium, the
Netherlands, Denmark, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Italy, and recently Spain. In France the
Archdiocese is the most important Orthodox diocese, with 40 parishes, including
the Cathedral of St Alexander Nevsky in Paris, the Cathedral of St Nicholas at
Nice and the church of the Russian Cemetery of St Geneviève-des-Bois.
Its composition throughout reflects the diversity and complexity of the
situations with which Orthodoxy is familiar in the West: there are parishes of
Russian emigrés worshipping in the religious vernacular of their country
of origin, and right next to them parishes that attract the faithful of several
nationalities, as well as completely western parishes, worshipping in various
languages according to the countries where they happen to be. The vast majority
of the clergy and faithful are now citizens of those countries and half the
clergy are of western origin. In some parishes worship is entirely in Slavonic;
in others it is in French (or German, Norwegian or Dutch), and in many places
in two languages. There are attached to the Archdiocese the Institute of
Orthodox Theology in Paris (the Institut Saint-Serge) as well as the convent of
Notre-Dame-de-toute-Protection at Bussy-en-Othe, near Sens. The Archdiocese has
an Internet website in Russian and French (and some Dutch) at www.exarchat.org.
j
|